CANCER, ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, PROGRESSIVE SCIENCE AND THE LAW
BOOK TITLE: "FROM MIS-INFORMED CONSENT TO ENLIGHTENED CONSENT: FROM MAINSTREAM IDEOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY TO EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE: WITH PLEADINGS FROM A CANCER MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CASE".
To further the advancement of public health, justice and science, while contributing in meaningfully reversing the cancer and medical malpractice epidemic, all we would need to do is to convince one Judge to allow “cam” (complementary and alternative medicine) in the courtroom via jury instructions based on expert testimony and fact witnesses ("anedoctal evidence") and then one enlightened Jury to render a plaintiff's verdict based on three jury instructions: 1: Medical negligence on the failure to secure a “cam” informed consent on both diagnostic procedures and treatment options. 2: Medical negligence on the failure to detect and monitor cancer with a “cam” detection and diagnosis work-up. 3: Breach of standard by not including a cancer “cam” plan of action (meaning the best of mainstream and alternative oncology). With a plaintiff verdict published appellate precedent confirmation on these three instructions, there would be a "contagious" precedential value thereto. As a result, any cancer plaintiff in the Nation would be able to invoke this case thereby being in a better position to convinced other Courts and Juries to render a truthful “cam” verdict for their own case. If this happened, it would be possible to meaningfully contribute to better prosecute and un-mask much of mainstream oncology dogma and activity as "mal-practice" if not "reckless neglect". As a result, Society (including but not limited to public finance) would also benefit as would patients, insurance companies, albeit not as much for orthodox oncologists (many of whom receive hefty chemo commissions and gifts) and their pharmaceutical corporations allies and lawyer bed-partners. Author Christian Pierre Joubert, French naturopath and former law teacher, litigated such a trial (on behalf of his father's estate, who died from cancer via medical negligence and dogma), and started this book when he was invited at the L.A. cancer control symposium in 2005 to speak about this subject, on " how to argue cancer alternative medicine in the courtroom".
CLICK ON THE BOOK ONE LINK IN THE MENU FOR A FREE DOWNLOAD ON THIS BOOK'S INTRODUCTION
BOOK TWO: ON THE TOBACCO FRONT - PRE-ORDER THIS UN-PRECEDENTED BOOK
THE CANCER EPIDEMIC CAN NOT BE SOLVED UNTIL TOBACCO PRODUCTS ARE RECOGNIZED FOR WHAT THEY ARE: POISON
PREFACE FROM BOOK
The petitioner’s father died from a Pall Mall induced lung cancer. The petitioner, who has international duties under international humanitarian and human rights norms like all of us, phoned the prosecutor’s office, the FBI and ATF agencies to request the arrest of Brown Williamson Tobacco directors, invoking cigarette poisoning as the probable cause to the death. On the grounds that this product is legal, the officials refused. Shortly thereafter, petitioner called back and proposed the same arrest but extending the arrest to law makers who accepted tobacco finances and enacted pro tobacco laws, based on the international crime against humanity legal theory, a legal foundation that incorporates state and individual responsibility and which was used to prosecute criminals and law makers who massively gazed and poisoned civilians during the Second World War (Cf. Nuremberg Trial 6 FRD 69 (1946). Request Denied. Again. Unsatisfied with these abusive denials, on September 11, 2001, the petitioner from Paris France faxed Brown William Tobacco via the ABC process server an amended complaint alleging not only the classical products liability and conspiracy, inter alia, causes of action, but also, in the name of Humanity, he argued the applicability of the very same Crime against humanity which was invoked in Nuremberg, demonstrating that all American Courts can assert universal jurisdiction to prosecute this hideous crime against life and all the more so that Executive and Congressional complacency and duplicity significantly contribute to the promotion of mass tobacco poisoning. The one which extinguishes over five millions lives each year in the world. And this, for no other reason than criminal "greed". The following question has been put before the Federal Supreme Court and the inter-American human rights commission, where this case is presently pending:
“Is there a substantial difference between a Saddam Hussein who massively gazed to death thousands of Kurds for the safeguarding of oil revenue wells and State public agents who have, in the name of the Unites States of America and democracy, legally aided and abetted tobacco corporations to massively gas (via hydrogen cyanide and carbon monoxide contained in cigarettes, among many others toxins) and poison millions of deceived innocent consumers for the safeguarding of cash flow ?”
Born and raised in the Bordeaux wine area of France, (Europe), Christian Pierre Joubert has been an organic farmer-peasant and naturopath in South France as well as a political science and law teacher in different universities in Europe & at Gonzaga law school in Spokane, WA, where he established the School’s international human rights law section. Former director of a small holistic cancer health center in the Mediterranean Pyrenean mountains of South France, he is presently in the United States delving into research and litigating different lawsuits including cancer medical malpractice and tobacco products liability actions.